Carl Icahn, Stephen Sweeney Go At It Over Atlantic City’s Gambling Future

Carl Icahn, Stephen Sweeney Go At It Over Atlantic City’s Gambling Future

Carl Icahn accuses brand New Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney of attempting to sell out Atlantic City by supporting a north Jersey casino.

Business Carl that is mogul Icahn nj-new Jersey State Senate President Stephen Sweeney exchanged harsh words final Friday, with each accusing the other of selling out some portion of Atlantic City for their gain. The war of words started after Sweeney participated in protests with union workers from the Trump Taj Mahal, protests of which Icahn proved to be always a major target.

As we reported earlier this week, those protests were made to fight back against a Trump Entertainment intend to use of the contract and cut pensions and benefits for workers in order to cut costs and keep the casino open.

The company says that the casino will need to close on November 13 unless many concessions are granted to it, including the cutbacks in employee benefits and $25 million in aid from hawaii, along with a tax assessment that is reduced.

Workers Blame Icahn

But Icahn proved to be a major figure in the protests. The protesters demonstrated near the Tropicana, which can be owned by a group led by Icahn, and numerous see him as the threat that is true the advantages and wages offered by their present positions. In bankruptcy court, Trump Entertainment has requested permission to turn its venue over to Icahn by converting the financial obligation he holds in the company into ownership of the casino. Icahn says he’d then be willing to spend another $100 million into the Taj Mahal, but as long as his concessions are given.

Sweeney reacted to this by saying that there had been no method their state would contribute to the transfer that is proposed Icahn, and sharply criticized the investor’s plan for the casino.

‚If he does not get every thing he wants, he’s closing anyway,‘ Sweeney stated. ‚But if he can get all this cash from the taxpayers and the workers, he then’ll invest in the property.‘

Sweeney had been only one of several politicians from both major parties who criticized Icahn’s proposal at a Boardwalk press conference.

‚You get absolutely nothing from us until such time you treat workers with respect and dignity,‘ Sweeney said.

Icahn Fires Back

But Icahn had been ready to fire right back at Sweeney and other state officials who’ve criticized him while also proposing that gambling enterprises be built in north Jersey.

‚Sweeney is attempting to sell out Atlantic City to New that is northern Jersey the one hand, and now he’s telling all these workers in Atlantic City that Carl Icahn is always to blame, whenever I’m the only one that took a risk with $80 million when no body else would,‘ Icahn stated. ‚ On the main one hand, we’re to think Senator Sweeney is Atlantic City’s staunchest defender, yet having said that, the same Senator Sweeney is off in north Jersey making plans to allow gaming outside of the latest York City, a concession which will suggest the end of gaming in Atlantic City.‘

Sweeney seems in United States District Court on this week so that they can get a judge to force the concessions he’s got asked for, since the state and Atlantic City have so far rejected his terms.

Trump Entertainment can also be hoping that the Delaware bankruptcy court will allow it to end the current union contract. The organization is accusing the workers‘ union of sacrificing 3,000 jobs at the Taj Mahal in an attempt to protect workers at other casinos, as under the union contract, any concessions won at one casino would be allowed at other Atlantic City casinos also.

UK Gambling Act Challenge by GBGA Snuffed by London High Court

London’s High Court ruled against a GBGA challenge to the new British Gambling Act, and can be implemented the following month. (Image: thesun.co.uk)

Great britain Gambling Act goes into effect next thirty days after a challenge from the Gibraltar Betting and Gaming Association (GBGA) was rejected by the High Court week that is last. The challenge that is legal already been successful in delaying the execution of the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act from October 1 to November 1, nevertheless the ruling means the legislation will be enforced as anticipated.

‚we am of this conclusion that parliament was well within its rights to act since it did,‘ stated Lord Justice Nicholas Green.

GBGA Fails to Make Its Situation

In his ruling, Green said that the GBGA failed to exhibit that the regulations that are new be illegal beneath the laws of either the UK or europe. He also rejected a alternate plan proposed by the GBGA, a so-called ‚passporting‘ plan, that could enable the GBGA to maintain complete certification control over its operators while agreeing to share data with the British Gambling Commission (UKGC).

The ruling means that all online gambling operators wishing to conduct business with customers in the United Kingdom will need to hold a license with the gambling payment here by November 1. This won’t be an issue for most companies that wanted to stay in the country, as most believed they would want to utilize for a license by October 1.

The genuine changes will come into play on December 1. That is when a brand new point-of-consumption tax will be implemented in the UK on licensed operators. This will mean that all operators can pay a 15 per cent tax on their revenues derived from British customers, regardless of where they are headquartered or what taxes they might pay in their home nations.

GBGA Still Has Concerns

The UKGC had been happy with all the decision, since the organization not only beat right back the challenge, but was awarded £100,000 ($159,400) to cover for its legal costs.

‚We welcome this judgment and that can now complete preparations for utilization of the Act on 1 November,‘ the UKGC published in a statement.

Conversely, the GBGA expressed its disappointment with the court’s decision.

‚ Cross-border regulatory regimes require significant co-ordination and co-operation on key legal and regulatory issues and great britain already had this with all the Gibraltar industry, regulator and jurisdiction,‘ the GBGA said following the ruling. ‚ We maintain this legislation just isn’t in the most useful interests of customers, the industry and the regulator itself and that you can find more effective ways of dealing with the challenges of regulation and competition in this sector.‘

The GBGA also stated that it may be time for European officials to come up by having an framework that is overarching online gambling.

‚We remain concerned great britain regulator will see it tough to hold companies to account in jurisdictions outside of the EU where it does not have any appropriate powers and common framework that is legal culture,‘ the Association statement stated. ‚Given this judgment there is now even greater requirement for an EU legal framework for online gambling if we have been to effectively protect all European consumers, enjoy a common market and avoid each member state deciding alone how to deal with an activity that naturally crosses edges.‘

The licensing that is new will also require operators to provide a appropriate rationale due to their operations in gray markets where they heart of vegas real casino slots free coins do not hold licenses. These requirements have led some operators to select to not apply for a UK license, although the majority of major companies plan to stay in the united kingdom market.

From Here to Eternity: The Massachusetts Casino Journey

The Wynn Resorts casino proposition in Everett is considered the most present to win a permit from the Massachusetts Gaming Commission. (Image: Wynn Resorts Holdings)

Massachusetts casino licensing law is back in the news in a big means this week, as the Wynn Everett task won the Greater Boston casino license after having a contentious battle against a Mohegan Sun proposal. That decision, which was reached by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission in a 3-1 vote, sets the phase for Steve Wynn to build their big resort in Everett, on the site of a former Monsanto plant in the outskirts of Boston.

But it is additionally the culmination greater than three years of guidelines, votes, debates and referendums, most of which combine to write the tale of Massachusetts‘ casino gambling legislation. In the event that you’re unfamiliar with what’s going on in their state, here’s a recap that is quick of you need to get up to speed.

How It All Started

On November 22, 2011, Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick signed the Gaming that is expanded Act. This bill allowed for four brand new gambling facilities to be built into the state: three casinos and one slots parlor. Each of the three casino licenses was linked with a particular region: one for Western Massachusetts, one for the Greater Boston area, and one for Southeastern Massachusetts. The slots parlor could anywhere be built in the state.

Developers who wished to apply for starters of the four licenses were needed to get through an application that is extensive, one that included mandatory referendums by regional communities where casino proposals were made.

Those referendums ended up being a part that is critical of certification process, as several promising tasks neglected to earn the approval of voters. Most notably, a plan for the casino at Suffolk Downs in East Boston had been scuttled when votes overwhelmingly rejected the proposition, which sooner or later led to that plan being resurrected on the Revere side of the Suffolk Downs racetrack.

Ultimately, the choice of whether to award licenses and to whom they need to go was determined by the Massachusetts Gaming Commission, a five-member panel that oversaw the licensing process that is entire.

And the Award Goes To…

In late February, the very first license was awarded to Penn National Gaming, which earned the right to build a slots parlor in Plainville. That plan was chosen over a Massachusetts Live! proposal in Leominster and a Raynham Park option that did not prove popular because of the payment. Eventually, the commission voted 3-2 in favor of the Penn nationwide plan over the Leominster alternative.

In the commission then approved MGM Resorts International for the Western Massachusetts casino license june. The commission voted unanimously in support of awarding the license towards the proposed MGM resort in Springfield, which emerged since the contender that is only the region.

This week, the gaming commission also awarded the Greater Boston casino license to a Wynn Resorts project in Everett. The Wynn plan had been selected more than a Mohegan Sun proposal in Revere by a 3-1 vote, with gaming commission Chairman Stephen Crosby recusing himself through the procedure.

Southeastern Massachusetts License Still to Be Decided

Therefore far, few severe contenders have actually emerged for the Southeastern Massachusetts casino license, which caused the video gaming commission to push back the deadline for applications from September 30, 2014 to December 1 of this 12 months. The location’s timeline was already behind the rest of the state because of the possibility that the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe might build a casino in Taunton. When that effort felt through, the spot was exposed to designers.

So far, only KG Urban has used to build in the area, although the commission believes that other candidates who were rejected in one other two parts of the continuing state may decide to try again in Southeastern Massachusetts.

Casino Law Repeal Nevertheless a Possibility

There remains the opportunity that each of these venues may never open. There’s been significant opposition to permitting casinos in Massachusetts since the law was first signed, and who has culminated in casino opponents getting a question on a statewide ballot this November that may ask voters if they wish to repeal the casino law. Present polling implies that such a repeal is not likely, however: one September that is early poll UMass Lowell/7News discovered that 59 percent of likely voters planed to vote against the repeal effort, with just 36 percent saying they might vote to repeal the law.

 

Comments are closed.