Like, attention, and also the inhibition off view regarding close choice

Like, attention, and also the inhibition off view regarding close choice

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you can Person Choices, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area away from connection when you look at the person mating. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, Good. (2002). Web sites paradox revisited. Record of Societal Factors, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites paradox: A social tech that decrease societal involvement and you may mental well-being? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Yards., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, uruguayan brud time, and lifetime of marriages and you will divorces. Most recent Population Profile, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research from closeness, hobbies, and you can connection: Research the brand new presumptions of triangular theory off like. Emotional Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Feeling most useful regarding creating tough: Social evaluations inside romantic dating. Record off Identification and you will Societal Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit cognition away from close competition. Journal off Character and you may Societal Psychology, 97(1), 74–87.

An excellent. (2001)mitment and you may relationships fix systems

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. An effective., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you attractive choices: This new advanced psychology out of relationships fix. Advancement and you will Human Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data from argument and you can agreement within the disappointed and you can nondistressed relationship partners. Record away from Contacting and you will Medical Mindset, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An effective., Environmentally friendly, A good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationship development on line: What’s the huge attraction? Diary off Societal Things, 58(1), 9–30.

Some great benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization as well as the design of pleasure inside the romantic dating

Neff, L. A good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-research objectives from inside the close relationships: A style of international enhancement and certain confirmation. Inside the P. Noller & J. A beneficial. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents regarding the study of few correspondence (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-specialist bond from the lens regarding connection principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Browse, Habit, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh social keeping track of system: Increased awareness to societal cues since the an adaptive reaction to societal exclusion. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Brand new public outcast: Ostracism, social different, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Drive.

Enter, T., & Lydon, J. E. (2001). Around the world and you will particular relational models on the contact with social relationships. Diary regarding Identification and you can Personal Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Connection and advice looking to when you look at the close matchmaking. Personality and Societal Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and particular connection representations inside adulthood: Is there a love?. Record From Public And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. Within the J. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate close dating: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection actually feeling certainly spouses due to the fact a purpose of this new similarity in their common knowledge. Identification And you can Personal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Results of salience off extrinsic advantages towards the liking and you may loving. Log away from Identification and you may Public Psychology, 38(3), 453–460.

Comments are closed.